Segment
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Premium2. Wanli SW611 Lowcost
Comparison: Wanli SW611 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Wanli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Wanli (0%). The first tyre test of Wanli SW611 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the SW611 and the UltraGrip 9+ were tested.
| # | Wanli SW611
| GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Wanli SW611 16.
Worst position in test
2. Wanli SW611 16.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
2. Wanli SW611 69%
Dry braking
1. Wanli SW611 78%
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Wanli SW611 43%
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Wanli SW611 26%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
2. Wanli SW611 82%
Snow handling
2. Wanli SW611 56%
Snow traction
2. Wanli SW611 80%
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
2. Wanli SW611 82%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
| Wanli SW611 Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,5 |
| GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
