Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Wanli SW611 Lowcost
Comparison: Wanli SW611 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Wanli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Wanli (0%). The first tyre test of Wanli SW611 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the SW611 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested.
| # | Wanli SW611
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Wanli SW611 16.
Worst position in test
2. Wanli SW611 16.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Wanli SW611 26%
Wet braking
2. Wanli SW611 43%
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
2. Wanli SW611 56%
Snow traction
2. Wanli SW611 80%
Snow braking
2. Wanli SW611 82%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Wanli SW611 78%
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Wanli SW611 82%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
| Wanli SW611 Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,5 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
