Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Premium2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S and Yokohama W.drive V905, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Wintrac Xtreme S and the W.drive V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Wintrac Xtreme S is made - Netherlands.
| # | Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S
| Yokohama W.drive V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Premium2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Satisfactory
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S | 33,7 | 32,7 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Rating: - | 2,4 | 2,4 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,4 |
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: - | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 4,0 | 3,5 | 2,4 |
| Show test details | |||||||