These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Let's compare two popular summer tyres; the Vredestein ULTRAC and the Kumho Ecsta HS52.
The Vredestein ULTRAC, manufactured in HU and coming as first equipment on BMW 2-series Active Tourers, ranked 4th in the Autobild test out of 51 tyres. The evaluation highlighted excellent driving dynamics and short wet and dry braking distances. Notably, the tyre exhibited very good aquaplaning properties, which can enhance safety and control during summer rain storms. However, drawbacks included lower tyre lifespan due to increased tread wear and higher rolling resistance, which could imply less fuel economy.
On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, an upgrade from the previous Kumho Ecsta HS51, outperformed the Vredestein taking the 3rd position in the Autobild test. The HS52 excelled particularly in dry braking, dry handling, wet braking, and price/value ratio. Despite the lack of indication of where this tyre is made, it got noticed favourably for favourable mileage and wet circle cornering capability in the ADAC test, where it also ranked 3rd out of 16 tyres.
Crucially, the Ecsta HS52 performed very well in wet conditions as noted by TyreReviews.com, offering good dry handling, short dry braking distances, good aquaplaning resistance and impressively, had low external noise. The only notable weakness was the average wet grip.
Comparatively, the Vredestein ULTRAC offered superior wet handling, aquaplaning resistance and good dry braking, though was criticised for high rolling resistance and external noise.
Overall, both tyres show strengths and weaknesses. While the Vredestein ULTRAC offers impressive wet and dry performance, its shortened lifespan and higher rolling resistance may affect long term usability and fuel costs. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, whilst not as strong in wet grip conditions, makes up for it with remarkable dry performance, long predicted lifespan, and general fuel efficiency. Given that it also came in higher on most test rankings and the better price/value ratio, the HS52 might be the better overall option.
Learn more about these tyres at their respective manufacturer pages, Vredestein and Kumho.
Averaged from 4 tests
Vredestein ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.