Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium
Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Continental PremiumContact 7
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein ULTRAC
| Continental PremiumContact 7
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
We bring you an in-depth comparison of two summer tyres – the Vredestein ULTRAC and the Continental PremiumContact 7. The Vredestein ULTRAC was manufactured in Hungary, and the Continental PremiumContact 7 was produced in France, Slovakia, Germany, and the Czech Republic.
The Vredestein ULTRAC, tested on the BMW 2-Series Active Tourer, performed well in tests by ACE and Automotorsport, taking 2nd and 3rd positions respectively. Its strengths lie in aquaplaning, both longitudal and cross, and dry handling. However, there were concerns about understeering on wet and dry terrain, higher rolling resistance, and slightly extended braking distances (Vredestein).
Remarkably, the Continental PremiumContact 7 did better overall, securing first position in every test and outperforming previous models such as Continental PremiumContact 6 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. This tyre showed excellent performance, particularly in wet and dry braking, wet and dry handling, and comfort. However, its higher rolling resistance and increased external noise detracted from its all-round performance.
In direct comparison, both tyres performed well in aquaplaning tests. The Continental PremiumContact 7, however, consistently outperformed the Vratesdtein ULTRAC in dry and wet braking and handling. The Continental tyre additionally stood out in comfort, safety, and wet safety.
The PremiumContact 7's high rolling resistance and increased external noise may be a trade-off for its outstanding performance. The tyre fared well in durability testing, forecasted for a high mileage and low fuel consumption. The Vredestein ULTRAC though, has lower predicted longevity and higher tyre wear.
In conclusion, both tyres are capable performers. The Vredestein ULTRAC is a reliable option with good handling and aquaplaning features, while the Continental PremiumContact 7 is a top-performing all-rounder excelling in dry and wet conditions but may produce more external noise. Keep in mind, these results may vary depending on the vehicles and terrains they are used on.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 7.8 | ||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Outstanding | 9 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 214 | 47 | 92 | 13 | 5 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Highly recommended | 211 | 71 | 120 | 15 | 5 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Highly recommended | 214 | 71 | 123 | 15 | 5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | 2 | |||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Ultrac | |||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Sufficient | 3,83 | 2,3 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 101,3 | 103,3 | 99,2 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 104,7 | 106 | 103,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
