14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

#	Vredestein Ultrac Vorti /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /78%

Dimensions	R17 - R24	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti and the Continental PremiumContact 6 are both summer tyres, however, they have differed significantly in various test results and performance reviews. Let's compare both tyres based on these findings to give you a better understanding and help you make an informed decision.

The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti made in the Netherlands, received a rating of 55% from us. This tyre has shown considerable performance in wet conditions such as aquaplaning and wet braking according to Autobild tests, where it secured the 9th position out of 53. It also scored well on exterior noise and mileage in ADAC tests but got the 7th spot out of 16 tested tyres. In Automotorsport tests, despite receiving commendation for its dry lane-changing capabilities, it rounded up the list at 11th out of 11.

On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6, manufactured in Slovakia, Germany and Czech Republic, greatly outperformed its competitor and got an overall rating of 87% from us. It replaced its predecessor, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and has now been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7. In Autobild tests, securing 8th position out of 53, it was praised for its dry handling, mileage, and price/value. In the ADAC tests, it outshined all with being the 1st out of 16, acclaimed for its mileage, wet braking, and cornering abilities. The Gute-Fahrt tests had similar results, with it being number 1 out of 10. The story was the same in the Automotorsport test, where it came 2nd out of 11, with an impressive score for dry lane changing and handling.

In conclusion, both tyres have their strengths. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is good in wet conditions and external noise levels but not as impressive in other aspects. The Continental PremiumContact 6, however, performed exceedingly well in various tests, especially in wet conditions, dry handling and mileage offering the best value for the price. Therefore, the Continental PremiumContact 6 edges the competition overall. For more details, you can visit the manufacturer's pages for Vredestein and Continental.

Segment

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 266

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 69

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 13x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 3.

Worst position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 12.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 6.62

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary

Worst rating in test

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Good

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 79%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 71%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 82%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 79%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 80%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 77%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

85%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

81%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 83%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 98%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 87%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

86%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

61%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 40%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 94%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 70%

Price/value

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 57%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti

73%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

66%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 79%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 61%

Comfort

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 66%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1-	1
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	2
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	1
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti	33,4	31,3
Continental PremiumContact 6	33,2	30,2
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	1,3	2,8	2,0	1,6
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,5	2,9	2,0	2,4
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	1,7	2,4	3,6	2,0	2,1
Show test details