• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Vredestein (34%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
88%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti R
Kumho Ecsta PS71
75%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Wet Braking
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
60%
Wet Handling
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
98%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
85%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
60%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
94%
Best in category: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S (96.3%)
Dry Performance
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
92%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti R
Kumho Ecsta PS71
74%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Dry Braking
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
58%
Dry Handling
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Best in category: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S (97.5%)
Comfort & Noise
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
83%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti R
Kumho Ecsta PS71
49%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Noise Exterior
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
49%
Best in category: Continental SportContact 6 (100.0%)
Economy
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
74%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti R
Kumho Ecsta PS71
97%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
97%

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison