Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
