Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Vredestein (30%). The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Potenza Sport were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 1- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
