Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Vredestein (30%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R and Bridgestone Potenza S001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Potenza S001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Potenza S001 were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||