Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium3. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient3. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory2. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient3. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 101,1 | 130,3 | 102,4 | 100 | |
| Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta Rating: Sufficient | 89,8 | 86,6 | 93,1 | 89,5 | 101,1 | 73,3 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 93,5 | 90,2 | 96,9 | 104,5 | 99,3 | 86,7 | |
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Rating: Sufficient | 88,7 | 85,6 | 91,8 | 88,7 | 100,4 | 80,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
