Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 91 | 21 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin | 67 | 40 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 6 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 74 | 40 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Highly recommended | 222 | 109 | 113 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | 118 | 129 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
