Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 10.29
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 | 34.6 | 29.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: - | 228 | 104 | 124 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
