Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 71% compared to 63% of the Toyo Proxes Sport 2. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2025 225/45 R18 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Proxes Sport 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R45 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: - | 228 | 104 | 124 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
