Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 71% compared to 66% of the Nexen N fera Sport. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2020 when was the Nexen N fera Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the N fera Sport were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Nexen N fera Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
2. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||