Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Vredestein (34%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 245/35 R19 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Pilot Sport 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R17 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
