Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 97% compared to 71% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Pilot Sport 4 S were tested.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTOBILD
|
Summer
|
2025 | 295/30 R20 | View |
Performance comparison
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
