Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Falken Azenis RS820 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Falken Azenis RS820
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 71% compared to 57% of the Falken Azenis RS820. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2025 when was the Falken Azenis RS820 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Azenis RS820 were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Falken Azenis RS820
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R22 | R19 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Falken Azenis RS820 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis RS820 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Falken Azenis RS820 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
