Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Falken Azenis RS820
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 71% compared to 57% of the Falken Azenis RS820. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2025 when was the Falken Azenis RS820 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Azenis RS820 were tested.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTOBILD
|
Summer
|
2025 | 295/30 R20 | View |
Performance comparison
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Falken Azenis RS820
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
