18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Vredestein Snowtrac 5 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R16	R15 - R18	R13 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 55

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 4.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 30.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

87%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

75%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

85%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

88%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

78%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

82.7%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Show test details