Segment
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Vredestein (59%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Snowtrac 5 and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Vredestein Snowtrac 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Snowtrac 5 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Snowtrac 5 is made in Netherlands and Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea.
| # | Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium
2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended | 2,1 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Still recommended | 7,8 | ||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended | 8,0 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38 | 27,9 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38,9 | 27,0 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 2,7 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 4,0 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Show test details | |||||||