Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2
| # | Vredestein Quatrac
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
| Avon ZV7
| Toyo Celsius AS2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R22 | R13 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
4. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
4. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.644. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
4. Avon ZV7 0%
Snow braking
4. Avon ZV7 0%
Snow handling
4. Avon ZV7 0%
Snow cornering
4. Avon ZV7 0%
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Avon ZV7 79%
Wet handling
2. Avon ZV7 85%
Wet circle cornering
3. Avon ZV7 74%
Aquaplaning - cross
3. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Avon ZV7 75%
Dry handling
1. Avon ZV7 88%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Avon ZV7 82%
Comfort
4. Avon ZV7 0%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Avon ZV7 69%
Price/value
3. Avon ZV7 25%
Mileage
3. Avon ZV7 55%
