• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

# Vredestein Quatrac
/92%
Laufenn G Fit 4S
/64%
Toyo Celsius AS2
/52%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
/91%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
/79%

Add to comparison

Vredestein
Laufenn
Toyo
Michelin
GoodYear
DimensionsR15 - R20 R13 - R17 R15 - R20 R15 - R21 R14 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WinterWetDryRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+1–
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Exemplary
1-223+
Laufenn G Fit 4S
Rating: Good
22+ 2-2
Toyo Celsius AS2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2-1–
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test38.043.9
Vredestein Quatrac40.343.9
Laufenn G Fit 4S42.145.8
Toyo Celsius AS240.451.0
Show test details
AUTOBILD
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test36.850.5
Vredestein Quatrac40.255.4
Laufenn G Fit 4S42.758.2
Toyo Celsius AS239.959.0
Michelin CrossClimate 237.956.4
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341.555.2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,944,4
Vredestein Quatrac41,747,1
Laufenn G Fit 4S45,253,9
Toyo Celsius AS243,553,2
Michelin CrossClimate 239,9 49,2
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-343,946,8
Show test details