Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein Quatrac
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the head-to-head comparison Vredestein Quatrac vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, independent tests consistently put the Vredestein Quatrac slightly ahead overall (our score 94% vs 89%). Neither model has an indicated replacement, so both remain current test subjects. For brand information see Vredestein and Hankook.
Summary of test positions: Autobild (32 tyres) ranked the Quatrac 2nd and the Hankook 3rd — both excellent podium finishes, with Quatrac edging out mainly on wet performance. ADAC results show the Hankook in 3rd and the Quatrac in 6th (16 tyres tested), highlighting that results can vary by test criteria and conditions. Specialist reviews (Tyre Reviews / TyreReviews.com) praise the Hankook’s dry performance and economy, while Autobild and earlier tests repeatedly highlight the Quatrac’s wet and winter strengths.
What the tests say — strengths
- Vredestein Quatrac: Outstanding wet performance and aquaplaning resistance, strong snow traction and handling, low exterior noise and comfortable ride. Autobild repeatedly notes very good wet handling, aquaplaning reserves and winter capabilities. These qualities make it a top choice where safety in wet and mixed conditions is a priority.
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750: Excellent dry handling and short braking distances on dry road (TyreReviews), low rolling resistance, predicted high mileage and good fuel economy. ADAC and multiple Autobild editions praise its reliable all-round behaviour, strong predicted longevity and economical operation.
Weaknesses highlighted in tests
- Vredestein Quatrac: Mixed comments on tread life — several tests note average mileage. Some reports mention slightly higher rolling resistance in specific model years.
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750: Slightly weaker wet and winter performance in comparative tests, and inconsistent aquaplaning resistance in some independent measurements. A few reviews mention a bit more exterior noise compared with the Quatrac.
Aggregated verdict
Across the test pool the Vredestein Quatrac emerges as the safer, more confidence-inspiring option in wet and winter conditions — its repeated top marks for aquaplaning, wet lap handling and snow braking make it the better pick for drivers who face frequent rain or mixed seasonal conditions. The Quatrac’s higher overall rating and multiple podium finishes reflect this strength.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is the stronger contender for drivers prioritising dry-road dynamics, low rolling resistance and long tyre life. Tests repeatedly praise its precise dry handling, short braking distances on dry tarmac and predicted high mileage — making it a compelling choice for mileage-focused buyers and those who value fuel economy.
Recommendation: choose the Vredestein Quatrac if your priority is wet-weather safety and winter versatility; pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 if you prioritise dry performance, economy and expected longevity. For detailed specs and test pages see the tyre entries: Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, and visit the manufacturers at Vredestein and Hankook.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
10
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| VREDESTEIN Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 1- | 2 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40,6 | 46,3 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41,1 | 47,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
