Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein Quatrac
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 are excellent all-round tyres from esteemed manufacturers Vredestein and Hankook respectively. Let's analyse how these tyres match up and summarise their strengths, weaknesses, and mutual test performance.
The Vredestein Quatrac, produced in Hungary, earned an 88% rating on our site. Its performance in tests has been commendable, with positions well within the top 10. It has shown excellence in areas such as dry handling, dry braking, and wet handling. However, it was found to have average wet and snow braking performance and a higher than average rolling resistance, per data from Autobild. Aquaplaning performance was also lauded in Autobild, but lags a bit on mileage. Meanwhile in other tests, it showed impressive wet braking, cornering, and handling.
Made in Korea, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is a small step ahead with an 89% rating. It is a successor to the Hankook Kinergy 4S, showing improvements in several areas. The tyre stands out with its accurate and safe characteristics on dry roads, low wear, lightweight and low fuel consumption. However, some test data points to light weaknesses on wet and winter roads, and it has a slightly higher rolling noise than others. Nonetheless, it ranked impressively in ADAC's classifications, taking third place out of 16. Autobild gave it high marks as well in dry handling, wet braking, and comfort, but noted poor aquaplaning resistance and average snow performance.
When matched head-to-head in multiple tyre tests, both tyres performed superbly. The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 often came ahead with a slightly higher test rating. However, certain tests found the Vredestein Quatrac to excel in areas like wet handling and dry braking. Therefore, the choice between these two models might come down to individual preferences for comfort, handling, or braking performance.
In conclusion, the Vredestein Quatrac offers excellent performance in dry and wet conditions but shows weaknesses in snow braking and rolling resistance. On the other hand, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 impresses with precise dry road characteristics, high longevity, and efficient fuel consumption but shows slight weaknesses on wet and winter roads. Both tyres are respectable choices for all-round use and perform admirably in various tyre tests.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 1- | 2 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40,6 | 46,3 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41,1 | 47,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
