Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle3. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost4. Giti Gitisport S2 Lowcost5. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Giti Gitisport S2 vs. Apollo Aspire XP
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Apollo Aspire XP 8.564. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.645. Giti Gitisport S2 13.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory4. Giti Gitisport S2 Satisfactory5. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Good2. Giti Gitisport S2 Satisfactory3. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended5. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
