Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle3. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Linglong Sport Master
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory3. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
