Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary3. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2- | |||
| Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42,9 | 46,5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
