Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Vredestein Quatrac Pro was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Quatrac Pro and the Solus HA31 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Quatrac Pro is made - Hungary.
| # | Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2- | |||
| Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42,9 | 46,5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||