18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Vredestein Quatrac Pro /52%	Falken Azenis FK510 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%

Dimensions	R17 - R22	R17 - R22	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Falken Azenis FK510 125

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 102

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Falken Azenis FK510 29x

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 12x

Best position in test

1. Falken Azenis FK510 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2.

Worst position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 9.

3. Falken Azenis FK510 15.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 5.17

3. Falken Azenis FK510 5.45

Year of the last test

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. Falken Azenis FK510 2022

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

3. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary

Worst rating in test

1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

88%

Falken
Azenis FK510

72%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

66%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 80%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 71%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 86%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 95%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 92%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 70%

Dry performance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 78%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 74%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 53%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 55%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 53%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 51%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

82%

Falken
Azenis FK510

79%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 89%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 79%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 61%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 86%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 83%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 86%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 76%

Wet side guide

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 74%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 67%

Wet performance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 90%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 83%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 76%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Falken Azenis FK510 A

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

55%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

?

Falken
Azenis FK510

?

Snow traction

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 65%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 0%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 0%

Snow braking

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 66%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 0%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 0%

Snow handling

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 65%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 0%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 0%

Snow cornering

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 70%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 0%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

77%

Falken
Azenis FK510

75%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 84%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 76%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Comfort

1. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 73%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

Interior noise

1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 90%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB

2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

81%

Falken
Azenis FK510

73%

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

67%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 64%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 61%

Mileage

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 69%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 68%

Price/value

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 81%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 67%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 80%

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro 72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. Falken Azenis FK510 E

3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac Pro

79

Continental
PremiumContact 6

?

Falken
Azenis FK510

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands