Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.5 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Rating: Good | 8.5 | 8.4 | 7.2 | 6.9 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Very good | 9.5 | 8.2 | 10.0 | 8.9 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 7.8 | 8.7 | 9.2 | 8.0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
