Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV Premium2. Falken e.Ziex Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs. Falken e.Ziex
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Falken (46%). In this particular case, the Falken e.Ziex has a better rating of 90% compared to 59% of the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV. The first tyre test of Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Falken e.Ziex first tested.
| # | Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
| Falken e.Ziex
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken e.Ziex Very good2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken e.Ziex Good2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Falken e.Ziex 61%
Wet braking
1. Falken e.Ziex 87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Falken e.Ziex 68%
Wet handling
2. Falken e.Ziex 69%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Falken e.Ziex 88%
Dry handling
1. Falken e.Ziex 81%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Falken e.Ziex 78%
Comfort
2. Falken e.Ziex 78%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Falken e.Ziex 95%
