Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac 5 vs. Michelin CrossClimate+
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein Quatrac 5
| Michelin CrossClimate+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When considering allround tyres, the Vredestein Quatrac 5 and Michelin CrossClimate+ are two options that may come to mind. Both have performed promisingly in various tyre tests, offering a host of features that make them stand out in their segment. Here, we provide a comparative study between these two models based on real testing data and provide a verdict on each tyre's strengths and weaknesses.
The Vredestein Quatrac 5 is a Dutch-made tyre, recognised for its superior exterior noise levels, as evidenced from the AutoBild test, where it ranked 6th out of 27 tyres. Despite this commendable feature, the tyre only achieved a 36% rating on our website, indicating room for improvement in other performance areas.
On the other hand, the Michelin CrossClimate+ scored significantly higher in our rating, with a score of 71%. The tyre's exceptional performance in dry handling, mileage, and price/value ratio, emerged as its chief strengths, helping it clinch the second position in the AutoBild test. In the AutoMotorSport test, this tyre secured a respectable third place among seven tested tyres.
Overall, test results suggest that the Michelin CrossClimate+ consistently outperforms the Vredestein Quatrac 5 in various categorises. Yet, the latter's exterior noise level is an area where it outshines.
If we focus on the brands behind these models, Vredestein and Michelin have both established a significant presence in the allround tyre market. However, the test data suggests that Michelin has a slight edge over Vredestein in overall performance in this segment.
It's also important to note that neither tyre has been replaced by a newer model, making both the Vredestein Quatrac 5 and the Michelin CrossClimate+ as current models in their respective segments.
In conclusion, while the Vredestein Quatrac 5 has its strengths, particularly in reducing external noise, the Michelin CrossClimate+ stands out as the overall winner in comparative testing, showing superior performance in dry handling, mileage, and price/value ratio. However, the decision ultimately hinges on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient2. Michelin CrossClimate+ Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 43,9 | 48,6 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ | 40,8 | 48,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,0 | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 Rating: Still recommended | 7,8 | ||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ Rating: Recommended | 8,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
