Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (55%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Quatrac 5 and Kumho Solus HA31, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Vredestein Quatrac 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Quatrac 5 and the Solus HA31 were tested. We also know where Quatrac 5 is made - Netherlands.
| # | Vredestein Quatrac 5
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 160 | 44 | 41 | 44 | 31 | ||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 160 | 50 | 37 | 42 | 31 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||