Segment
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Vredestein (60%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter and Nokian WR C3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the Comtrac 2 Winter and the WR C3 were tested.
# | Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
| Nokian WR C3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Conditionally recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
Show test details |