Segment
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Vredestein (59%). But when it comes to comparing Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter and Nokian WR C3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the Comtrac 2 Winter and the WR C3 were tested.
| # | Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter
| Nokian WR C3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Conditionally recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||