Segment
1. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Viking Protech NewGen vs. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Esa+Tecar summer tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Viking (28%). In this particular case, the Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro has a better rating of 50% compared to 28% of the Viking Protech NewGen. The first tyre test of Viking Protech NewGen was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Protech NewGen and the Spirit Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Viking Protech NewGen
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro 13.252. Viking Protech NewGen 32.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory2. Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | 2,5 | 3,4 | |||||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Good | 2,3 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |||
| Esa+Tecar Spirit Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,8 | 2,9 | 1,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
