Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Viking ProTech HP Lowcost
Comparison: Viking ProTech HP vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Viking (38%). But when it comes to comparing Viking ProTech HP and Nokian Powerproof, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Viking ProTech HP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the ProTech HP and the Powerproof were tested.
| # | Viking ProTech HP
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Viking ProTech HP | 37,3 | 34,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
