Segment
1. Viking ProTech HP Lowcost2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Viking ProTech HP vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Viking (32%). The first tyre test of Viking ProTech HP was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda SportControl 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the ProTech HP and the SportControl 2 were tested.
| # | Viking ProTech HP
| Fulda SportControl 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.69
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Viking ProTech HP | 37,3 | 34,8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
