Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Viking ProTech HP Lowcost
Comparison: Viking ProTech HP vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Viking (38%). But when it comes to comparing Viking ProTech HP and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Viking ProTech HP was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the ProTech HP and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Viking ProTech HP
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Viking ProTech HP | 37,3 | 34,8 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
