Segment
1. Viking Fourtech Lowcost2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Viking allround tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Rotalla (53%). The first tyre test of Viking Fourtech was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Fourtech and the Setula 4 Season RA03 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Viking Fourtech
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Viking Fourtech Lowcost2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Satisfactory
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 45,3 | 51 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 42,9 | 59,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 46 | 53,5 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 43,3 | 55,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||