Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium4. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
5. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good5. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended5. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert Rating: Good | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 34.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
