• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

# Uniroyal RainSport 3
/0%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
/0%

Add to comparison

Uniroyal
Yokohama
DimensionsR14 - R20 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison


Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 — a head-to-head comparison of two popular summer tyres aimed at drivers who want confident handling with an emphasis on everyday safety. Below, we summarize the available independent test data and outline each model’s key strengths and weaknesses to help you choose.



Quick links:
Uniroyal RainSport 3 tyre |
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 tyre |
Manufacturer: Uniroyal |
Manufacturer: Yokohama


Test results at a glance


In the major Auto Bild comparative test featuring 52 summer tyres, the results favored the Uniroyal:

  • Uniroyal RainSport 3: 6th of 52

  • Yokohama Advan Fleva V701: 15th of 52


Overall from the mutual test, the RainSport 3 ranked higher, indicating a stronger all-round performance in that assessment. While both placed in the top third, the Uniroyal secured a notably better final position.


What the positions suggest



The RainSport 3’s higher finish aligns with its wet-focused design philosophy—this model is widely chosen by drivers who prioritize wet grip and aquaplaning resistance. The Advan Fleva V701, positioned as a sporty, everyday UHP tyre, typically emphasizes precise steering and dry-road confidence. The Auto Bild outcome suggests the Uniroyal may offer a broader performance envelope across the test’s mix of wet and dry disciplines, while the Yokohama remains competitive but not quite at the same level in the combined score.


Strengths and weaknesses


Uniroyal RainSport 3



  • Strengths: Traditionally strong in the wet, with confidence-inspiring braking and aquaplaning resistance; a pragmatic choice for regions with frequent rain.

  • Potential trade-offs: As a wet-oriented tyre, ultimate dry-track sharpness and wear longevity may not match the very sportiest or most endurance-focused rivals, depending on size and vehicle.


Yokohama Advan Fleva V701



  • Strengths: Sporty road manners with responsive steering and reassuring dry grip; an appealing option for enthusiastic driving on everyday roads.

  • Potential trade-offs: In the cited test, its overall score fell behind the RainSport 3, suggesting room to improve in mixed-condition performance, especially when tests heavily weight wet metrics.


Replacement status


As of our latest update, neither tyre has a listed direct successor in our database. If a replacement is released, we will add a link to the newer model for quick navigation.


Verdict: which tyre is better overall?



Based on the mutual Auto Bild test, the Uniroyal RainSport 3 holds the edge thanks to its higher overall ranking. It’s the safer bet if you value all-weather confidence with an emphasis on wet safety. The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 remains a solid performer—especially appealing for drivers who prioritize sporty feel and dry-road handling—but it trails the Uniroyal in the comparative result.


For more details or to check sizes and availability, visit the product pages:
Uniroyal RainSport 3 and
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. Learn more about the brands at Uniroyal and Yokohama.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

3

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,228,7
Uniroyal Rainsport 337,432,3
Yokohama Advan Fleva V70135,232,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-1-1
Uniroyal RainSport 3
Rating: Satisfactory
1- 2-2-
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Rating: Conditionally recommended
3+2+2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,134,6
Uniroyal Rainsport 336,434,7
Yokohama Advan Fleva V70134,940,2
Show test details