Segment
1. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 K117
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 36,4 | 34,7 | |||||
| Nokian zLine | 36,1 | 40,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
