Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle3. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 K117
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.453. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory3. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 35,7 | 32,4 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 34,8 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
