Segment
1. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Nokian zLine vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| # | Uniroyal RainSport 3
| Nokian Powerproof
| Nokian zLine
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  | |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R20 | R16 - R21 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Nokian Powerproof 7.454. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory3. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 35,7 | 32,4 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 37,7 | 36,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
