Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle3. BF Goodrich g-Grip Upper-middle4. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle5. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost6. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs BF Goodrich g-Grip — test comparison
This comparison looks at two summer tyres regularly featured in tyre tests: the Uniroyal RainSport 3 and the BF Goodrich g-Grip. Both are positioned as mainstream summer tyres, but independent test results show a clear difference in relative performance. You can find the manufacturers here: Uniroyal and BF Goodrich.
Test summary (AutoBild): in the AutoBild group test of 50 summer tyres the RainSport 3 finished 4th out of 50, while the BF Goodrich g‑Grip placed 18th out of 50. Neither model in our dataset shows a newer replacement model listed, so there is no replacement link to report.
What the positions tell you
- The Uniroyal RainSport 3’s top‑5 finish (4/50) indicates it performed very strongly overall in the test battery — a result typical of tyres that combine confident wet handling, short braking distances and stable aquaplaning resistance. A 4th place in a 50‑tyre field is a clear sign of competitive wet performance for a summer tyre.
- The BF Goodrich g‑Grip’s mid‑pack finish (18/50) indicates a reliable all‑rounder but one that was outperformed by several competitors in critical test areas. Mid table typically reflects acceptable dry performance and comfort, but weaker relative results in the most demanding wet or high‑speed handling assessments.
Strengths & weaknesses — Uniroyal RainSport 3
- Strengths: High test ranking suggests excellent wet braking and handling, good directional stability and effective water evacuation — key attributes for a summer tyre prioritised for safety in wet conditions.
- Weaknesses: High-performing wet tyres sometimes compromise slightly on rolling resistance or longevity versus economy‑focused tyres; also a top test placing can come with a premium price versus mid‑tier alternatives.
Strengths & weaknesses — BF Goodrich g‑Grip
- Strengths: A solid mid‑table result points to dependable behaviour in everyday driving — balanced dry handling, comfort and potentially good value for money.
- Weaknesses: The 18th place finish shows it was beaten by many rivals in the same test set; that usually means longer wet braking distances or less refined aquaplaning resistance compared with the top performers.
Overall verdict
Based on the AutoBild results, the Uniroyal RainSport 3 is the stronger tyre in comparative tests, with a clear advantage over the BF Goodrich g‑Grip (4th vs 18th out of 50). If you prioritise top wet performance and high test rankings, the RainSport 3 is the better pick. If you want a more budget‑friendly, balanced summer tyre and can accept a mid‑pack test position, the g‑Grip remains a reasonable choice.
For product pages and manufacturer details: Uniroyal — manufacturer, tyre page RainSport 3; BF Goodrich — manufacturer, tyre page g‑Grip.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda SportControl 2 11.694. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.336. BF Goodrich g-Grip 19.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory4. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory5. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory6. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory3. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory4. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory5. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended6. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 37,4 | 32,3 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 36,5 | 36 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 36,4 | 34,7 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 36,2 | 41,8 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 34,9 | 35 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 35,9 | 28,7 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 37,8 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
