Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle4. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| # | Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Nokian WR D4
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R21 | R13 - R20 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.882. Nokian WR D4 6.043. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.214. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
7
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36,1 | 27,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36 | 28,1 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,5 |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 0,5 | 2,3 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | 2- | 3 | 1- | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 39,1 | 25,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38,9 | 27,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
