18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R15 - R18	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Wet braking

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 84%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 63%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 68%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 94%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 85%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 71%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 69%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Snow braking

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow handling

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow traction

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Exterior noise

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

72%

Dry braking

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 72%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	37,4	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3	2	2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Show test details

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands