18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R14 - R21	R15 - R18	R14 - R21	R13 - R17	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

6. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

81%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 84%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 79%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 63%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 75%

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 68%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

5. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 71%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 69%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

89%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 86%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 85%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 85%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 76%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 66%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

76%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 74%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 67%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 79%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 65%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Price/value

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 87%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 72%

5. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 66%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

78%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

6. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 73%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 87%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 84%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

73%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 72%

5. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 73%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

5. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 73%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 15 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2+	2-	2+	2	3+
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	1-	2	1-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	37,4	28,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	33,4	28,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2+	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2-	2	2+	3+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	34,2	25
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	35,2	25
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2+
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2-	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	32	24,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3	2	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2	1-
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	34,8	28,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,9	2,3	3,1	0,5	1,4
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	3,2	2,1	2,8	3,2	2,0	2,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2,1	2,3	2,5	2,5	3,5	2,0	1,7
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	3,3	2,0	2,1	2,5	3,6	1,5	2,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2+	2-	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2,4	2,4	1,9	2,2	2,8	2,0	1,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Show test details

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands