Segment
2. Tristar Snowpower UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Snowpower UHP vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Tristar (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the Snowpower UHP and the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A were tested.
| # | Tristar Snowpower UHP
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Tristar Snowpower UHP Rating: Not recommended | 4 | 2 | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
